Author: barry hills

It is difficult to know where to start. The corrupt mainstream media proclaimed Biden the winner of the presidential election today, a title he has happily accepted. If you don’t understand why the media gets to decide the election results then you get credit for paying attention.

The core issue, when you combine all the factors, is that fully half of America no longer trust we have free and fair elections. Without trust in fair elections we officially move into being ruled by the oligarchy. We know exactly who they are and we know their agenda. This is the fear our founding fathers had for our future AND it is THE reason we have a second amendment … to keep tyranny in check.

There is ample evidence of election corruption but how hard Trump will fight for proper inspection of the vote tally is unclear. Personally, I believe momentum will win out as it always does with the help of the MSM. Repeat the big lie enough times, that there was no corruption, and people will fall in line and believe it.

My qualitative statistical analysis informs me that some of the individual state results are scientifically impossible. Take a penny and flip it 40 million times. Most people understand the penny would land heads 20 million times and tails 20 million times. However when you introduce the “the deliberate intent of people”, the rules of randomness no longer apply. Can you have a close race? Of course. Can the results be statistically identical, no. Its a sure sign to me that votes were being fabricated and added to the tally to alter the results. In a genuine close race, it takes just a few counterfeit votes to reverse the legitimate results.

Facebook post from a friend:

On this day of all days I encountered the first person in my personal space in public to break the mask mandate. I was shocked at first, outraged second, then overcome with a need to converse with this younger middle age man. So when he crossed my path I the next isle, I summoned my courage. I am not a rabble rouser, nor an angry irate citizen. What I discovered is I was deeply wounded by his decision. When I asked him why he wasnt waring a mask, he seemed surprised at first but he was gracious. He says cause they don’t work. He cited the CDC. I responded that I think that had been updated and in fact recommended highly.  We agreed to disagree but I shared with him that his choice hurt me. That I worry about my ….. mom and my ….. grandson. He simply looked at me and blinked hard. As luck would have it, he ended up in the check out line behind me. I was curious how the checker would handle this. Bless her heart she is stuck there when customers act like they only have to answer to themselves. I was surprised when she asked him for his mask and he said he didn’t have one, she walked away. As I walked beside her I told her I was sorry she had to deal with that. She said to me, if I have to wear one so does he. I parted company at that, but whispered good luck as I left. I was able to return to my safe zone. She is not. People, our choices are not ensconced in a bubble. Our choices affect others. I do not appreciate meeting a man without a mask as I shop. He may or may not be affected with the virus, but he affected at least 2 of us negatively today. And that’s just not right.

My Response:

1) You can say you had no intention to be confrontational but this guy gets to choose for himself if he felt you confronted him, independent of your intent.  Unless you approached him saying “I see you are not wearing a mask; would you like to talk about it?” (which I doubt) then I can easily see him feeling like you (an older woman) confronted him. In your original post you said you approached him and asked “why…”, only in your 2nd followup post did you expand, saying you “asked him to enter into a dialogue”.   

I was once in a auto repair parking lot wandering around, preoccupied with finding my car when the voice of a man yelled out from behind me saying loudly “thats it, just walk on by and don’t say anything!”  his voice was dipping with vitriol and sarcasm.  While he is perfectly within his rights to verbalize is discontent with my behavior, he had no right to EXPECT everyone behave “his way”.   I remember the incident vividly because I felt attacked and confronted without cause.  

Last year when collecting my empty garbage cans off the street I found a note from a lady in the subdivision; accusing me of being rude and insensitive because of where I placed my cans (on the street) apparently too close to her home (on the opposite side of the street).  The next day I noticed her and her band of bicycle enthusiasts riding up and down our long private driveway but said nothing.  Later that week she stopped me out on the street (confronted me, literally cutting me off in the street with her car) demanding an explanation for my rude behavior.  Incredible.  We’re talking about garbage cans, in the street, where they belong, and she thinks I owe her a report on my thoughts.  Who is this lady and why does she think she has a right to know what I am thinking?

Increasingly I see us using the word “rights” to describe things we like or want and assert expectations on the thoughts of others; but  thats not how “rights” work. We have no right to be comfortable with speech; to the contrary we have a right to free speech especially if it is the kind that makes us politically uncomfortable.  But not a right to the thoughts of others.

2) For me, the flip side of #1 is that we are increasingly expecting others to take care of us.  There is no rational reason to expect others to protect us.  We each need to take care of ourselves first, failing to do so risks not being able to help others should we choose to do so.  We each have a responsibility to care for ourselves.  Walk away from danger.  Avoid danger.  Including unmasked strangers.

3) I challenge the degree of your concern for your safety when you chose to approach this guy gaining closer proximity and thus increasing your odds of infection.  I don’t believe you were as worried as you claim to be.  I believe something else was in your head.  It doesn’t make sense to me that you would approach a stranger you fear may be sick and at the same time express concern about spreading the flu to your family and friends.  Notice a difference here….. I am saying “I believe” …. I am not asserting what is really going on in your head as I have no idea, no right to ask, and I am not asking.  Just as in my examples, you are within your rights to tell him what you think about his behavior but he has no obligation to explain it to you, “an older woman confrontational stranger” what he is thinking.  Confrontation breeds division and the words we choose matter more now than ever.  

The results of the election are officially uncertain. The states of PA, GA, AZ, MI, WI & NC are committed to dragging out the vote count for 2 more weeks while Americans and the entire world watch. To be clear, these states are hunting for Biden votes. The delay is wholly the responsibility of the Democrats and Leftists. Its a disgrace and the delay undermines the integrity of our election process. America looks weak right now. America looks like a banana republic. If we cannot preserve the integrity of the election process we are truly lost as a nation.

• For me, the article reads like just another hit piece.
• It’s no secret the intelligence agencies don’t like Trump and have worked very hard to unseat him.  
• The story is long and convoluted which is a common intimidation tactic; attempting to elevate the IQ of the author so readers dare not question his conclusions
• The prediction of post Election Day violence has the effect of encouraging violence, it will become self fulfilling.
• The violence we’ve witnessed has been largely from the left and any post election violence will follow the same pattern.  
• Trump will certainly go to court against any corruption he sees in the election process but I don’t believe he will do anything provocative to prevent a smooth transition should he fail reelection…. predictions of Trump refusing to leave the White House are seeding unrest
• Trump is egomaniacal but unlike the vast bulk of DC he is NOT a sociopath and he genuinely cares about the country.  The assertion  he only cares about himself is not reflected in his policies
• If Biden wins it will be because the media has successfully convinced Americans Trump has failed on COVID.  The media routinely exploits the public’s lack of understanding Federalism and the Lefts ongoing efforts to shift all control away from the states towards greater centralized federal control.  The mess in California for example is not trumps doing, it’s governor Newsom and the State’s congress.
• The question we should be asking is if Trump wins in a landslide will the left support the voice of the people or go off the deep end?

I could spend hours detailing the depth of disgrace on exhibit by 60 minutes during the interview of President Trump. The silver lining is the interview backlash will likely push Trump over the finish line to a 2nd term. Thank you Leslie, you lazy primadonna bitch.

Fact: Clinton’s are the quintessential corrupt politicians selling access for power and millions of dollars

Fact: Biden’s have done the exact same thing, again for millions of dollars.

Fact: The US intelligence agencies conspired to remove a sitting president from power.

Fact: Nobody is being held accountable for these grotesque actions.

Fact: The media and tech giants suppress and dismiss the Left’s transgressions

American law and order is dead. There are separate justice systems for the rich and powerful than for the proletariat. Without equal justice we ARE a banana republic.

As things continue to open slowly county by county I continue to have issues with what is happening to religious celebrations. For us, this means Sunday Mass.

Currently we are doing a “hybrid” mass; consisting of online powerpoint mass and small number of participants in the church. The online mass is a change I suspect is here to stay, flu or no flu. Never has there been a more soul-less celebration of the mass – powerpoint via youtube with voice over from the presider. Not even sure why they bother to broadcast live – it won’t be long before you can only order up Sunday mass on demand just like we do on Hulu or Netflix. Hell; make it pay per view!

The in-person mass is open to a small number of masked people strategically placed at the mandated social distance. To get one of these “prized” seats you must make a “reservation”; essentially “register” to attend mass. No longer is seating open on a first come first served basis. This is wrong. Yea, I know the motives are innocent enough but that is part of the issue; people are blind to the implications of “getting permission” to come to mass! If you have to ask permission then the presumption is you can be DENIED ENTRANCE! So now the government is limiting the number of people who can attend mass.

Why don’t people see this is wrong?

The act of registration is simply a form of control. When control comes from the government it is always, ultimately, enforced at the tip of a gun. The granting of a clean registration gives you “permission” to proceed while denial of registration denies you from whatever “it” is that you are wanting to do. Can you do “it” anyway? Of course, but then you are in violation of a statute or law.

But why must we register to exercise constitutional rights? Many of them are held as “self evident truths” granted by God himself? Why do we allow government to control that which we say is “endowed by our creator”? What is the criteria by which some rights require registration while others do not, and more importantly why?

The proxy for registration is “free”. Anything free from the government is only available as long as the government says you can have it. But again, why make some things free but not others? Why isn’t food free? or housing? Certainly they are just as critical as healthcare.